SC questions HC judge’s appointment | Latest News Delhi - Hindustan Times
close_game
close_game

SC questions HC judge’s appointment

Hindustan Times | By, New Delhi
Jul 17, 2008 01:51 AM IST

The Supreme Court asked whether an additional judge of a High Court, considered unfit to become permanent, be given extension to continue on a temporary basis, reports Bhadra Sinha.

Can an additional judge of a High Court, considered unfit to become permanent, be given extension to continue on a temporary basis?

HT Image
HT Image

The Supreme Court on Wednesday made this query during the hearing of former Law Minster Shanti Bhushan’s petition challenging the appointment of Justice Ashok Kumar as a permanent judge of the Chennai High Court. Senior advocate Bhushan has claimed the present Chief Justice of India did not consult the two senior most judges of the Supreme Court before confirming Justice Kumar.

Hindustan Times - your fastest source for breaking news! Read now.

Even as the court posed questions over Justice Kumar’s appointment, the Government justified it. In his written submissions, Additional Solicitor General Gopal Subramanium said that the Government was of the view that once a candidate is found suitable for the appointment of an additional judge, elaborate consultations were not required for his confirmation.

Referring to Justice Kumar’s extension as a temporary judge in August 2005 by the then Chief Justice of India, RC Lahoti, the bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat said: “If somebody is unfit to be confirmed as a permanent judge, how can he be given extension? How can the person become fit for extension if he is unfit to become permanent?”

Appearing for Bhushan, senior advocate Anil Dewan concurred with Justice Pasayat’s deliberation and said: “Justice Kumar was not made permanent in August 2005 when Chief Justice Lahoti headed the collegium. However, the six officers who were junior to him were made permanent. He was simply granted extension to continue as a temporary judge.”

Dewan emphasised the need for a judicial review in Justice Kumar’s case. “The Supreme Court’s status is admired for it strikes down its own rules, if they are found to be arbitrary or illegal.” He said even before confirming a temporary judge, the Chief Justice of India is bound to consult the two senior most judges of the Supreme Court. “The consultation is not just restricted to the appointment of additional judges,” he added.

Unveiling 'Elections 2024: The Big Picture', a fresh segment in HT's talk show 'The Interview with Kumkum Chadha', where leaders across the political spectrum discuss the upcoming general elections. Watch now!
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Share this article
  • ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    author-default-90x90

    Bhadra is a legal correspondent and reports Supreme Court proceedings, besides writing on legal issues. A law graduate, Bhadra has extensively covered trial of high-profile criminal cases. She has had a short stint as a crime reporter too.

SHARE
Story Saved
Live Score
OPEN APP
Saved Articles
Following
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Thursday, March 28, 2024
Start 14 Days Free Trial Subscribe Now
Follow Us On