Petitioner in case that led to min 2yr term for CBI chief upset over new ordinances | Latest News India - Hindustan Times
close_game
close_game

Petitioner in case that led to min 2yr term for CBI chief upset over new ordinances

ByMalavika Murali
Nov 15, 2021 10:25 AM IST

Opposition parties have hit out at the move wondering why the ordinances were issued ahead of the Parliament winter session that begins on November 29

The petitioner in a landmark Supreme Court judgement in 1997 that led to structural changes in the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), including a minimum two-year tenure for the agency’s director, has expressed disappointment over ordinances empowering the Centre to appoint the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate chiefs for up to five years.

The 1997SC judgement in the Vineet Narain vs Union of India case, popularly known as the Jain hawala case, was intended to shield the CBI director from outside interference (Photo CBI)
The 1997SC judgement in the Vineet Narain vs Union of India case, popularly known as the Jain hawala case, was intended to shield the CBI director from outside interference (Photo CBI)

“Any investigative agency can never be 100% independent; they are always puppets in the hands of the government. But there was an effort by some of us to make sure that some autonomy was granted to the institution and we were able to achieve this with the help of the Supreme Court. But gradually it is feeling that we are back to square one and there is total control with the government. There is hardly any autonomy left,” said Vineet Narain, the petitioner.

Hindustan Times - your fastest source for breaking news! Read now.

The 1997 judgement in the Vineet Narain vs Union of India case, popularly known as the Jain hawala case, was intended to shield the CBI director from outside interference and make the post more transparent.

Narian said in the changed scenario, fair and objective investigation cannot be expected.

Also Read: Opposition slams move to extend the terms of ED, CBI ahead of parliament meet

In a tweet, lawyer Prashant Bhushan also criticised the ordinances. “Shocking & malafide! An attempt to further subvert the independence of the CBI & ED.”

Opposition parties have hit out at the move wondering why the ordinances were issued ahead of the Parliament winter session that begins on November 29.

Former National Investigation Agency head Navneet Wasan backed the ordinances saying a longer tenure and appointment by a robust and objective process will be better for efficiency.

Unveiling Elections 2024: The Big Picture', a fresh segment in HT's talk show 'The Interview with Kumkum Chadha', where leaders across the political spectrum discuss the upcoming general elections. Watch now!

Get Current Updates on India News, Election 2024, Mukhtar Ansari Death News Live, Bihar Board 10th Result 2024 Live along with Latest News and Top Headlines from India and around the world.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Share this article
SHARE
Story Saved
Live Score
OPEN APP
Saved Articles
Following
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Friday, March 29, 2024
Start 14 Days Free Trial Subscribe Now
Follow Us On