All dogs aren't nuisance: SC speaks up for man's faithful friend | Latest News India - Hindustan Times
close_game
close_game

All dogs aren't nuisance: SC speaks up for man's faithful friend

Hindustan Times | By, New Delhi
Feb 03, 2015 04:15 PM IST

Court questions the authority of municipal bodies to pick stray dogs off the streets and kill them.

Man's best friend may well have a much-needed ally in its corner in the country's highest judicial body.

HT Image
HT Image

The Supreme Court on Monday, while refusing to be "dog-phobic", questioned the authority of municipal bodies to pick stray dogs off the streets and kill them simply because they are a "nuisance" to the public.

Hindustan Times - your fastest source for breaking news! Read now.

"A faithful dog is a faithful friend," said a bench headed by justice Dipak Misra while hearing a petition filed by People for Elimination of Stray Animals, which wants stray dogs to be killed as they are a menace.

The bench noted the animal welfare laws do not clearly define "nuisance" and that causes a problem.

Posting the case for detailed hearing on March 25, justice Misra also noted the subjective definitions in the animal acts also meant that people with a ingrained dislike to canines - "the dog-phobic" - would be naturally more inclined to brand the animal a nuisance.

Under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, if civic bodies receive a complaint that a dog has become a source of public nuisance they can "seize" the so-called offending canine, drag it to the local pound and kill it.

The Centre, however, took a contrary stance in the Animal Birth Control Rules (ABC rules) formulated under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act of 1960, and only permits extermination of rabid, terminally-ill or mortally wounded dogs.

Given the difference between local and Central laws, senior advocate Anand Grover, appearing for Animal Welfare Board, submitted that "nuisance" is a subjective term.

"When a dog barks, for some people it is a nuisance," he said adding extermination of stray dogs for just being a nuisance was unfair to the animals who mostly react to human stimuli.

"Many such dogs behave in such a way because they are troubled by people throwing stones at it or when it is subjected to some sort of pain," said Grover adding the municipality had alternative options such as sterilising the canine.

Grover pointed out that the SC had observed that all animals, even owner-less stray dogs, were entitled to a life of dignity. He was pointing to the 2014 decision banning jallikattu in Tamil Nadu.

Senior advocate TR Andhyarujina said the court should decide on whether there was "any discretion given to municipal authorities to put a dog to sleep."

"We feel there is no such discretion given. You cannot put a dog to sleep unless it has rabies or is terminally ill," said Andhyarujina.

Unveiling Elections 2024: The Big Picture', a fresh segment in HT's talk show 'The Interview with Kumkum Chadha', where leaders across the political spectrum discuss the upcoming general elections. Watch now!

Get Current Updates on India News, Election 2024, Mukhtar Ansari Death News Live, Bihar Board 10th Result 2024 Live along with Latest News and Top Headlines from India and around the world.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Share this article
  • ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    author-default-90x90

    Bhadra is a legal correspondent and reports Supreme Court proceedings, besides writing on legal issues. A law graduate, Bhadra has extensively covered trial of high-profile criminal cases. She has had a short stint as a crime reporter too.

SHARE
Story Saved
Live Score
OPEN APP
Saved Articles
Following
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Friday, March 29, 2024
Start 14 Days Free Trial Subscribe Now
Follow Us On