Beauty didn’t kill this beast: How the real King Kong went extinct | World News - Hindustan Times
close_game
close_game

Beauty didn’t kill this beast: How the real King Kong went extinct

AFP | By, Paris
Jan 05, 2016 09:18 AM IST

The largest ape to roam Earth died out 100,000 years ago because it failed to tuck into savannah grass after climate change affected its preferred diet of forest fruit, scientists suggest.

The largest ape to roam Earth died out 100,000 years ago because it failed to tuck into savannah grass after climate change affected its preferred diet of forest fruit, scientists suggest.

An image from the Senckenberg Research Institute shows the estimated size of the Giganthopithecus or giant gorilla (L) in comparison with a human. The Gigantopithecus, a giant gorilla that looks like King Kong, disappeared a million years ago from the surface of the Earth due to the inability to adapt to environmental changes according to scientists.(AFP Photo)
An image from the Senckenberg Research Institute shows the estimated size of the Giganthopithecus or giant gorilla (L) in comparison with a human. The Gigantopithecus, a giant gorilla that looks like King Kong, disappeared a million years ago from the surface of the Earth due to the inability to adapt to environmental changes according to scientists.(AFP Photo)

Gigantopithecus -- the closest Nature ever came to producing a real King Kong -- weighed five times as much as an adult man and probably stood three metres (nine feet) tall, according to sketchy estimates.

Hindustan Times - your fastest source for breaking news! Read now.

In its heyday a million years ago, it inhabited semi-tropical forests in southern China and mainland Southeast Asia.

Until now, though, almost nothing was known about the giant’s anatomical shape or habits.

The only fossil records are four partial lower jaws, and perhaps a thousand teeth -- the first of which turned up in the 1930s in Hong Kong apothecaries where they were sold as “dragon’s teeth.”

These meagre remains “are clearly insufficient to say if the animal was bipedal or quadrupedal, and what would be its body proportions,” Herve Bocherens, a researcher at Tübingen University in Germany, told AFP.

A large molar of Gigantopithecus from the collection of Gustav Heinrich Ralph von Koenigswald, in the Senckenberg Research Institute. When the teeth first surfaced in the 1930s they were sold as “dragon’s teeth”. (AFP Photo)
A large molar of Gigantopithecus from the collection of Gustav Heinrich Ralph von Koenigswald, in the Senckenberg Research Institute. When the teeth first surfaced in the 1930s they were sold as “dragon’s teeth”. (AFP Photo)

Its closest modern cousin is the orangutan, but whether Gigantopithecus had the same golden-red hue, or was black like a gorilla is unknown.

Another mystery: its diet. Was it a meat-eater or a vegetarian? Did it share a taste for bamboo with its neighbour the prehistoric giant panda?

Answering this riddle might also tell us why a monster that surely had little to fear from other fauna went extinct.

Adapt or die

That’s where the teeth had a story to tell.

Examining slight variations in carbon isotopes found in tooth enamel, Bocherens and an international team of scientists showed that the primordial King Kong lived only in the forest, was a strict vegetarian, and probably wasn’t crazy about bamboo.

Analysing the teeth of the giant ape was how scientists determined that it followed a strictly vegetarian diet. (AFP Photo)
Analysing the teeth of the giant ape was how scientists determined that it followed a strictly vegetarian diet. (AFP Photo)

These narrow preferences did not pose a problem for Gigantopithecus until Earth was struck by a massive ice age during the Pleistocene Epoch, which stretched from about 2.6 million to 12,000 years ago.

That’s when Nature, evolution -- and perhaps a refusal to try new foods -- conspired to doom the giant ape, Bocherens explained.

“Due to its size, Gigantopithecus presumably depended on a large amount of food,” he said.

“When during the Pleistocene, more and more forested area turned into savannah landscapes, there was simply an insufficient food supply.”

And yet, according to the study, other apes and early humans in Africa that had comparable dental gear were able to survive similar transitions by eating the leaves, grass and roots offered by their new environments.

But for some reason, Asia’s giant ape -- which was probably too heavy to climb trees, or swing in their branches -- did not make the switch.

“Gigantopithecus probably did not have the same ecological flexibility and possibly lacked the physiological ability to resist stress and food shortage,” notes the study, which is to be published in a specialist journal, Quaternary International.

Whether the mega-ape could have adapted to a changing world but didn’t, or whether it was doomed by climate and its genes, is probably one mystery that will never be solved.

Climate change several hundred thousand years ago was also likely responsible for the disappearance of many other large animals from the Asians continent.

Unlock a world of Benefits with HT! From insightful newsletters to real-time news alerts and a personalized news feed – it's all here, just a click away! - Login Now! Get Latest World News along with Latest News from India at Hindustan Times.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Share this article
SHARE
Story Saved
Live Score
OPEN APP
Saved Articles
Following
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Wednesday, March 06, 2024
Start 14 Days Free Trial Subscribe Now
Follow Us On