Bilkis Bano case: SC to hear pleas against convicts’ release on November 29 | Latest News India - Hindustan Times
close_game
close_game

Bilkis Bano case: SC to hear pleas against convicts’ release on November 29

By, New Delhi
Oct 19, 2022 12:10 AM IST

The Supreme Court on Tuesday adjourned to November 29 the hearing of petitions challenging the Gujarat government’s decision to grant early release to 11 convicts sentenced to life in 2008 for the gang-rape of Bilkis Bano and murder of seven of her family members.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday adjourned to November 29 the hearing of petitions challenging the Gujarat government’s decision to grant early release to 11 convicts sentenced to life in 2008 for the gang-rape of Bilkis Bano and murder of seven of her family members.

A man offers sweets to the convicts after they were released from Godhra sub-jail on August 15. (PTI)
A man offers sweets to the convicts after they were released from Godhra sub-jail on August 15. (PTI)

A bench of justices Ajay Rastogi and CT Ravikumar granted time to the petitioners to file their response to the Gujarat government’s affidavit submitted a day ago, in which the state disclosed that remission of the convicts had the approval of the Union home ministry – though the Central Bureau of Investigation and the trial judge opposed their release – and that “good behaviour” of the convicts was a key reason to grant them the benefit.

Hindustan Times - your fastest source for breaking news! Read now.

During the brief hearing on Tuesday, solicitor general (SG) Tushar Mehta, who appeared for the Gujarat government, submitted that the state is going to argue that petitioners, who have nothing to do with the criminal trial in the matter, cannot be allowed to challenge the remission orders.

“We have a legal submission that strangers cannot intervene in criminal cases. That’s a common contention in all matters,” he said.

The SG was supported by advocate Rishi Malhotra, who represented one of the convicts in the matter. “We have objected to their (petitioners’) locus. Everyone is coming to this court and wanting to be tagged. This cannot be allowed in a criminal case,” Malhotra said.

To this, the court pointed out that the affidavits filed by both the state and the convict have raised questions over the maintainability of the petition and that point would be heard when the case is heard at length.

On his part, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the lead petition in the matter, sought time to submit a rejoinder to the state’s affidavit.

At this point, the bench wondered why a “bulky” affidavit containing a catena of judgments was filed by the Gujarat government. “I have not come across so many judgments cited in one affidavit. There is a series of judgments. Where is the reasoning or the application of mind...how does one find?” it asked the SG.

Mehta replied that the state should have avoided filing a voluminous affidavit but the idea was to submit all the case laws with the affidavit for an easy reference.

Bano was 21 years old and five months’ pregnant when she was gang-raped while fleeing the violence during the 2002 Gujarat riots, and her three-year-old daughter was one of the seven people killed. Two days after their release, Bano released a statement through her lawyer, saying the latest development has shaken her faith in justice. She urged the Gujarat government to “undo this harm” and give her back the “right to live without fear and in peace”.

The confirmation on MHA’s nod to the proposal of the Gujarat government came out in public domain for the first time in the affidavit; the release of the 11 life-term convicts on August 15 sparked an outrage from civil society organisations, women rights groups, and leaders cutting across party lines.

After a PIL, filed jointly by former CPI MP Subhashini Ali, journalist Revati Laul, and professor Roop Rekha Verma challenged the remission, the bench, on August 25 sought responses from the state and the convicts.

The affidavit filed on Monday evening revealed that remission was granted despite objections from the trial court judge who convicted the 11 men, and CBI, which investigated and prosecuted the case in Mumbai following the 2004 apex court order of shifting the trial outside Gujarat.

However, after the MHA and the relevant authorities in the Gujarat government, including the jail advisory committee, cleared the decks for the release of 11 convicts, the remission order was issued on August 10.

The Gujarat government justified its decision on the grounds that the remission was granted in accordance with the 1992 policy which placed no bar against premature release of rape convicts. Opinions of all relevant authorities were also considered, said the state, adding it “decided to release 11 prisoners since they have completed 14 years and above in prisons and their behaviour was found to be good”.

Union minister Pralhad Joshi also defended the release of the convicts. In an interview to NDTV, he said: “When the government and the concerned people have taken the decision, I don’t find anything wrong in it as it is a process of law.”

For convicts who have spent “quite some time” in prison, “there is a provision” for release, he said. “Accordingly, as per law, it is done,” he added.

Unveiling Elections 2024: The Big Picture', a fresh segment in HT's talk show 'The Interview with Kumkum Chadha', where leaders across the political spectrum discuss the upcoming general elections. Watch now!

Get Current Updates on India News, Election 2024, Mukhtar Ansari Death News Live, Bihar Board 10th Result 2024 Live along with Latest News and Top Headlines from India and around the world.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Share this article
SHARE
Story Saved
Live Score
OPEN APP
Saved Articles
Following
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Friday, March 29, 2024
Start 14 Days Free Trial Subscribe Now
Follow Us On